Biography

Download OGEA-102 Real Dumps and Start This Journey

2026 Latest RealVCE OGEA-102 PDF Dumps and OGEA-102 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1unV7YQf1CeMN48jObYKok-VPs7_XADdp

We provide 1 year of free updates. In conclusion, RealVCE guarantees that if you use the product, you will pass the OGEA-102 exam on your first try. Its primary goal is to save students time and money, not just conduct a business transaction. Candidates can take advantage of the free trials to evaluate the quality and standard of the OGEA-102 Dumps before making a purchase. With the right OGEA-102 study material and support team passing the examination at first attempt is an achievable goal.

Nothing venture, noting have. Many people know The Open Group certification will be a big effect for their career, but IT exams are difficult to pass as everyone knows. I want to introduce you our best products OGEA-102 latest exam cram file which is famous for its 100% pass-rate. Candidates from all over the world choose us and clear their exams certainly with only little cost fee and 15-30 hours preparation before the exam. OGEA-102 Latest Exam Cram file is useful and valid.

>> OGEA-102 Latest Demo <<

Valid OGEA-102 Test Camp - OGEA-102 Practice Test

You can enter a better company and improve your salary if you have certificate in this field. OGEA-102 training materials of us will help you obtain the certificate successfully. We have a professional team to collect the latest information for the exam, and if you choose us, you can know the latest information timely. In addition, we provide you with free update for 365 days after payment for OGEA-102 Exam Materials, and the latest version will be sent to your email address automatically.

The Open Group TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam Sample Questions (Q17-Q22):

NEW QUESTION # 17
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are working as the Chief Enterprise Architect within a law firm specializing in personal injury cases. Many of the firm's competitors have improved their litigation strategies, and efficiency by streamlining their processes using Artificial Intelligence {Al).
The CIO has approved a Request for Architecture Work to examine the use of Machine Learning in defining a new Al-driven litigation and finance process for the firm. This process would instruct the lawyers and analysts as to what tasks and portfolio they should work on. The key objectives are to increase task profitability, maximize staff utilization, and increase individual profitability.
The CIO has emphasized that the architecture should enable the fast implementation of continuous Machine Learning. The solution will need to be constantly measured for delivered value and be quickly iterated to success.
Some of the partners have expressed concerns about letting the Al make the decisions, others about the risks associated with use of it for the type of service they deliver. The CIO wants to know if these concerns can be addressed, and how risks will be covered by a new architecture enabling Al and Machine Learning.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to respond to the CIO recommending an approach that would enable the development of an architecture that addresses the concerns of the CIO and the concerns of the partners.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

• A. You recommend creation of a set of business models that can be applied uniformly across all architecture projects. The stakeholders will be trained to understand the business models to ensure they can see that their concerns are being addressed. Risk will be addressed once the Security Architecture is developed, which will happen later to avoid slowing down the agility required by the CIO.
• B. You recommend that a Communications Plan be created to address the key stakeholders, the most powerful and influential partners. This plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture reflecting their requirements. You will check with each key stakeholder that their concerns are being addressed. Risk mitigation and agility will be explicitly addressed as a component of the architecture being developed.
• C. You recommend that all possible models be created for each candidate architecture that will enable the Al and Machine Learning solution. This ensures that all the necessary data and detail is addressed. A formal review should be held with the stakeholders to verify that their concerns have been properly addressed by the models. Agility will be considered during Phase G Implementation Governance.
• D. You recommend that an analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken resulting in documenting the stakeholders and their concerns in a Stakeholder Map. The concerns and relevant views should then be defined for each group and recorded in the Architecture Vision document. The requirements will include risk mitigation through regular assessments. This will also allow a supervised agile implementation of the continuous Machine Learning.

Answer: D

Explanation:
A Stakeholder Map is a technique that can be used to identify and classify the stakeholders of the architecture work, and to document their key interests, requirements, and concerns. A stakeholder is any person, group, or organization that has a stake in the outcome of the architecture work, such as the sponsor, the client, the users, the suppliers, the regulators, or the competitors. A Stakeholder Map can help to understand the needs and expectations of the stakeholders, and to communicate and engage with them effectively1 The steps for creating a Stakeholder Map are:
Identify the stakeholders of the architecture work, using various sources and methods, such as interviews, surveys, workshops, or existing documents.
Classify the stakeholders according to their roles, responsibilities, and relationships, using various criteria and dimensions, such as power, influence, interest, attitude, or impact.
Define the concerns and relevant views for each stakeholder group, using various techniques, such as business scenarios, use cases, or value propositions. A concern is a key interest or issue that is relevant to the stakeholder, such as a goal, a problem, a need, or a risk. A view is a representation of the system of interest from the perspective of one or more stakeholders and their concerns.
Record the stakeholders and their concerns in a Stakeholder Map, which shows the mapping between the stakeholder groups, the concerns, and the views. The Stakeholder Map also shows the dependencies, assumptions, and issues related to each stakeholder and concern.
Therefore, the best answer is B, because it recommends the approach that would enable the development of an architecture that addresses the concerns of the CIO and the partners, using the Stakeholder Map technique. The answer covers the following aspects:
An analysis of the stakeholders is undertaken, which involves identifying, classifying, and defining the stakeholders and their concerns.
The stakeholders and their concerns are documented in a Stakeholder Map, which provides a clear and comprehensive picture of the stakeholder landscape and their interests.
The concerns and relevant views are recorded in the Architecture Vision document, which is the output of Phase A: Architecture Vision of the Architecture Development Method (ADM), which is the core process of the TOGAF standard that guides the development and management of the enterprise architecture. The Architecture Vision defines the scope and approach of the architecture work, and establishes the business goals and drivers that motivate the architecture work. The Architecture Vision also involves obtaining the approval and commitment of the sponsors and other key stakeholders, and initiating the Architecture Governance process2 The requirements include risk mitigation through regular assessments, which involves identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks that may affect the architecture, and determining the appropriate measures or actions to prevent, reduce, or mitigate the risks. Risk mitigation can also involve monitoring and reviewing the risk situation, and communicating and reporting the risk status and actions3 This approach also allows a supervised agile implementation of the continuous Machine Learning, which involves applying agile principles and practices to the architecture development and implementation, such as iterative and incremental delivery, frequent feedback, collaboration, and adaptation. A supervised agile implementation can help to ensure the quality, value, and alignment of the architecture, and to respond to the changing needs and expectations of the stakeholders.
References: 1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 24: Stakeholder Management 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: Architecture Development Method (ADM), Chapter 18: Phase A: Architecture Vision 3: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 32: Risk Management : The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 29: Applying Iteration to the ADM

NEW QUESTION # 18
Scenario
Your role is that of an Enterprise Architect, reporting to the Chief Enterprise Architect, at a technology company.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework for its Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice. The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) is the sponsor of the activity. The EA practice uses an iterative approach for its architecture development. This has enabled the decision-makers to gain valuable insights into the different aspects of the business.
The nature of the business is such that the data and the information stored on the company systems is the company's major asset and is highly confidential. The company employees travel a lot for work and need to communicate over public infrastructure. They use message encryption, secure internet connections using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), and other standard security measures. The company has provided computer security awareness training for all its staff. However, despite good education and system security, there is still a need to rely on third-party suppliers for infrastructure and software.
The Chief Security Officer (CSO) has noted an increase in ransomware (malicious software used in ransom demands) attacks on companies with a similar profile. The CSO recognizes that no matter how much is spent on education and support, the company could be a victim of a significant attack that could completely lock them out of their important data.
A risk assessment has been completed, and the company has looked for cyber insurance that covers ransomware. The price for this insurance is very high. The CTO recently saw a survey that said 1 out of 4 businesses that paid ransoms could not get their data back, and almost thesame number were able to recover the data without paying. The CTO has decided not to get cyber insurance to cover ransom payment.
You have been asked to describe the steps you would take to strengthen the current architecture to improve data protection.
Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?

• A. You would monitor for technology updates from your existing suppliers that could enhance the company's capabilities to detect, react, and recover from an IT security incident. You would prepare and run a disaster recovery planning exercise for a ransomware attack and analyze the performance of the current Enterprise Architecture. Using the findings, you would prepare a gap analysis of the current Enterprise Architecture. You would prepare change requests to address identified gaps. You would add the changes implemented to the Architecture Repository.
• B. You would ensure that the company has in place up-to-date processes for managing change to the current Enterprise Architecture. Based on the scope of the concerns raised, you recommend that this be managed at the infrastructure level. Changes should be made to the baseline description of the Technology Architecture. The changes should be approved by the Architecture Board and implemented by change management techniques.
• C. You would request an Architecture Compliance Review with the scope to examine the company's ability to respond to ransomware attacks. You would identify the departments involved and have them nominate representatives. You would then tailor checklists to address the requirement for increased resilience. You would circulate to the nominated representatives for them to complete. You would then review the completed checklists, identifying and resolving issues. You would then determine and present your recommendations.
• D. You would assess business continuity requirements and analyze the current Enterprise Architecture for gaps. You would recommend changes to address the situation and create a change request. You would engage the Architecture Board to assess and approve the change request. Once approved, you would create a new Request for Architecture Work to begin an ADM cycle to implement the changes.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation
Context of the Scenario
The scenario highlights significant risks due to ransomware attacks and the need to strengthen the company's Enterprise Architecture to improve data protection and resilience. TOGAF emphasizes the Architecture Compliance Review as a mechanism for ensuring the architecturemeets its objectives and addresses specific concerns such as security, resilience, and compliance with organizational goals.
The organization has already conducted a risk assessment but requires actionable steps to:
Address ransomware attack risks.
Increase the resilience of the Technology Architecture.
Ensure proper alignment with governance and compliance frameworks.
Option Analysis
Option A:
Strengths:
Highlights the need for up-to-date processes for managing changes in the Enterprise Architecture.
Recognizes the importance of governance through the Architecture Board and change management techniques.
Weaknesses:
The approach focuses solely on the Technology Architecture baseline but does not address the need for specific steps such as compliance review, gap analysis, or tailored resilience measures for ransomware risks.
It provides a broad and generic approach rather than a targeted plan for ransomware and data protection issues.
Conclusion: Incorrect. While it adheres to governance processes, it lacks specific actions to improve resilience and address the immediate security concerns.
Option B:
Strengths:
Proposes an Architecture Compliance Review, which is a core TOGAF process used to evaluate architecture implementation against defined objectives, ensuring it is fit for purpose.
Involves identifying stakeholders (departments) and tailoring checklists specific to ransomware resilience.
Emphasizes issue identification and resolution through structured review processes.
Weaknesses:
Does not explicitly address longer-term updates to the Enterprise Architecture, but this can be inferred as a next step following compliance recommendations.
Conclusion: Correct. This is the most suitable approach based on TOGAF principles, as it uses an established process to evaluate and improve the architecture's resilience.
Option C:
Strengths:
Includes monitoring for updates from suppliers to enhance detection and recovery capabilities, which is relevant to addressing ransomware risks.
Proposes a gap analysis to identify shortcomings in the current Enterprise Architecture and recommends addressing gaps through change requests.
Incorporates disaster recovery planning exercises, which are useful for testing resilience.
Weaknesses:
While thorough, the approach lacks the Architecture Compliance Review process, which is a more structured way to ensure the architecture meets resilience requirements.
Monitoring suppliers and running disaster recovery exercises are operational steps rather than strategic architectural improvements.
Conclusion: Incorrect. While it includes valid activities, it does not adhere to TOGAF's structured approach for architecture assessment and compliance.
Option D:
Strengths:
Proposes analyzing business continuity requirements and assessing the architecture for gaps, which is relevant to the scenario.
Suggests initiating an ADM cycle to address gaps, which aligns with TOGAF principles.
Weaknesses:
Focusing on initiating a new ADM cycle may be premature, as the immediate priority is to evaluate the existing architecture and address specific resilience concerns.
Does not mention compliance review or tailored resilience measures for ransomware attacks, which are central to the scenario.
Conclusion: Incorrect. It proposes a broader approach that may not adequately address the immediate concerns highlighted by the CSO.
TOGAF Reference
Architecture Compliance Review: A structured process used to evaluate whether an architecture meets the stated goals, objectives, and requirements (TOGAF 9.2, Chapter 19). It is particularly useful for identifying and addressing resilience requirements in scenarios involving security risks.
Stakeholder Engagement: Identifying and involving stakeholders (e.g., departments) is a critical part of architecture governance and compliance review (TOGAF 9.2, Section 24.2).
Change Management: The Architecture Compliance Review supports identifying necessary changes, which are then managed through governance and change management processes (TOGAF 9.2, Section 21.6).
By choosing Option B, you align with TOGAF's structured approach to compliance, resilience, and addressing security concerns.

NEW QUESTION # 19
Scenario:
You are working as an Enterprise Architect at a large company. The company runs a chain of home improvement stores, as well as a website for selling products. The website lets many brands work with the company.
The stores open seven days a week and use a standard method to track sales and inventory. This involves sending accurate and timely sales data to a central inventory management system that can predict demand, adjust stock levels, and automate reordering. The website is supported by regional fulfillment centers and also uses the central inventory management system. The central inventory management system is housed at the company's central data center.
The company has agreed to merge with a major competitor. The leadership teams of both organizations have said they are committed to a smooth transition for customers. All stores will keep their own brand names. They will combine the systems of the organizations, which includes merging retail operations and systems. Duplicated systems will be replaced with one standard retail management system. Additionally, they will reduce the number of applications being used. The CIO expects that these changes will lead to substantial cost savings for the newly merged company.
An enterprise plan for both organizations has been created. The aim is to set priorities for the transition, especially in terms of information management and application development. It is crucial to make decisions that will create long-term value.
The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice and uses the TOGAF standard for its architecture development method. The EA program is sponsored by the Chief Information Officer (CIO).
The Request for Architecture Work to oversee the transition has been approved. The project has been scoped, and you have been assigned to work on it.
You have been asked to confirm the most relevant architecture principles for the transition.
Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?

• A. Service Orientation, Compliance with the Law, Requirements Based Change, Responsive Change Management, Data Security
• B. Ease of Use, Common Use Applications, Data is an Asset, Technology Independence, Business Continuity
• C. Common Use Applications, Data is an Asset, Common Vocabulary and Data Definitions, Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise, Business Continuity
• D. Control Technical Diversity, Interoperability, Data is an Asset, Data is Shared, Business Continuity

Answer: C

Explanation:
The correct answer is C, as it aligns with the key TOGAF principles necessary for guiding enterprise architecture in a merger scenario where retail operations and systems are being consolidated.
Analysis of the Principles in Option C:
Common Use Applications
Since the two companies are merging, it is essential to standardize applications across the enterprise.
Using common applications ensures consistency, reduces costs, and improves efficiency.
TOGAF emphasizes this principle to prevent duplicate or redundant systems, which aligns with the CIO's goal of reducing the number of applications used.
Data is an Asset
In the scenario, a central inventory management system is a core business function.
Treating data as an asset ensures it is managed properly, shared efficiently, and used strategically across the merged organization.
This principle supports the company's ability to predict demand, adjust stock levels, and automate reordering.
Common Vocabulary and Data Definitions
The merger requires integrating different systems and data structures.
Having a common vocabulary ensures that all stakeholders (stores, fulfillment centers, and digital platforms) use consistent terminology and data definitions.
This minimizes confusion and ensures interoperability across business functions.
Maximize Benefit to the Enterprise
Every architectural decision should focus on the overall benefit to the business.
By consolidating IT systems and reducing redundancies, the company achieves cost savings, which directly supports this principle.
Business Continuity
The stores operate seven days a week, so system changes must ensure uninterrupted service.
Business continuity ensures that customers are not affected during the transition and that critical retail operations (sales, inventory tracking, and fulfillment) remain functional.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect?
Option A: Control Technical Diversity, Interoperability, Data is an Asset, Data is Shared, Business Continuity Control Technical Diversity is not the primary concern here. The focus is on system consolidation, not necessarily on limiting technology diversity.
Interoperability is important but not as critical as defining a common system and data structure.
Option B: Service Orientation, Compliance with the Law, Requirements-Based Change, Responsive Change Management, Data Security While service orientation and compliance are valuable, they are not the most relevant to this specific business transition.
Change management and data security are important but do not address the primary enterprise-wide architectural concerns of system consolidation.
Option D: Ease of Use, Common Use Applications, Data is an Asset, Technology Independence, Business Continuity Ease of Use is beneficial but is not a core architecture principle in this case.
Technology Independence is useful but does not align directly with the scenario's priority, which is consolidating applications and data structures.
Reference:
TOGAF Standard, ADM Techniques, Architecture Principles (Section 2.6)
TOGAF Standard, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques
TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Principles - The Open Group

NEW QUESTION # 20
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are the Lead Enterprise Architect at a major agribusiness company. The company's main harvest is lentils, a highly valued food grown worldwide. The lentil parasite, broomrape, has been an increasing concern for many years and is now becoming resistant to chemical controls. In addition, changes in climate favor the propagation and growth of the parasite. As a result, the parasite cannot realistically be exterminated, and it has become pandemic, with lentil yields falling globally.
In response to the situation, the CEO has decided that the lentil fields will be used for another harvest. The company will also cease to process third-party lentils and will repurpose its processing plants. Thus, the target market will change, and the end-products will be different and more varied.
The company has recently established an Enterprise Architecture practice based on the TOGAF standard as method and guiding framework. The CIO is the sponsor of the activity. A formal request for architecture change has been approved. At this stage there is no fixed scope, shared vision, or objectives.
Refer to the scenario
You have been asked to propose the best approach for architecture development to realize the CEO's change in direction for the company.
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

• A. You propose that the team focus on architecture definition including development of business models, with emphasis on defining the change parameters to support this new business strategy that the CEO has identified. Once understood, the team will be in the best position to identify the requirements, drivers, issues, and constraints for the change.
• B. You propose that this engagement define the baseline Technology Architecture first in order to assess the current infrastructure capacity and capability for the company. Then the focus should be on transition planning and incremental architecture deployment. This will identify requirements to ensure that the projects are sequenced in an optimal fashion so as to realize the change.
• C. You propose that the team uses the architecture definition document and focus on architecture development starting simultaneously phases B, C and D. This is because the CEO has identified the need to change. This will ensure that the change can be defined in a structured manner and address the requirements needed to realize the change.
• D. You propose that the priority is to produce a new Request for Architecture Work leading to development of a new Architecture Vision. The trade-off method should be applied to identify and select an architecture satisfying the stakeholders. For an efficient change the EA team should be aligned with the organization's planning, budgeting, operational, and change processes.

Answer: D

Explanation:
A Request for Architecture Work is a document that describes the scope, approach, and expected outcomes of an architecture project. A Request for Architecture Work is usually initiated by the sponsor or client of the architecture work, and approved by the Architecture Board, which is a governance body that oversees the architecture work and ensures compliance with the architecture principles, standards, and goals. A Request for Architecture Work triggers a new cycle of the Architecture Development Method (ADM), which is the core process of the TOGAF standard that guides the development and management of the enterprise architecture12 An Architecture Vision is a high-level description of the desired outcomes and benefits of the proposed architecture. An Architecture Vision is the output of Phase A: Architecture Vision of the ADM cycle, which is the first phase of the architecture development. An Architecture Vision defines the scope and approach of the architecture work, and establishes the business goals and drivers that motivate the architecture work. An Architecture Vision also involves obtaining the approval and commitment of the sponsors and other key stakeholders, and initiating the Architecture Governance process3 A trade-off analysis is a technique that can be used to evaluate and compare different architecture alternatives and select the most suitable one. A trade-off analysis involves identifying the criteria and factors that are relevant to the decision, such as costs, benefits, risks, and opportunities, and assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each alternative. A trade-off analysis also involves balancing and reconciling the multiple, often conflicting, requirements and concerns of the stakeholders, and ensuring alignment with the Architecture Vision and the Architecture Principles.
Therefore, the best answer is D, because it proposes the best approach for architecture development to realize the CEO's change in direction for the company. The answer covers the Request for Architecture Work, the Architecture Vision, and the trade-off analysis techniques that are relevant to the scenario.

NEW QUESTION # 21
Please read this scenario prior to answering the question
You are employed as an Enterprise Architect working within the Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at an electric vehicle manufacturer. The company focuses on designing, manufacturing, and advancing battery technology for sustainable transportation, while also investing in charging infrastructure, autonomous driving systems, and renewable energy integration.
The company is introducing a major change to its vehicle design over a five-year period. This will be a cross-functional effort between hardware and software teams, delivering significant new features in the vehicles they manufacture. It is planned to be developed in phases. An architecture to support strategy has been completed with a roadmap for a set of projects.
The EA team has taken over the architecture for the hardware and software automotive platform used by current vehicles, some of which will be used again in the new vehicle design. The EA team has started to pick which parts of the architecture to use again.
The presentation and access to different variations of data that the company plans to offer through its vehicles creates a design challenge. The application portfolio and supporting infrastructure must connect with multiple cloud services and data repositories in different countries to be able to handle the data at a large scale.
Enough of the Business Architecture has been defined, so that work can commence on the Information Systems and Technology Architectures. Those architectures need to be defined to support the primary business services that the company plans to provide. These services will handle and use the data created by vehicles, preparing the way for self-driving vehicles in the future.
The company uses the TOGAF standard as the basis for its Enterprise Architecture framework. The EA team reports to the Chief Technical Officer (CTO), who is the sponsor of the EA program. The CTO requires that the EA team follow the purpose- based EA Capability model as described in the TOGAF Series Guide: A Practitioners' Approach to Developing Enterprise Architecture Following the TOGAF® ADM.
Refer to the scenario
How would you plan, organize, and manage the architecture development at this stage?
Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

• A. Architecture descriptions for the Application, Data, and Technology Architectures should be developed at a suitable level to address the problems, and to identify the different options. For each project this includes identification of candidate architecture and solution building blocks. Solution providers should be identified, a readiness assessment performed, and an assessment of the viability and fitness of the solution options. The results should be added to the draft Implementation and Migration plan.
• B. Follow a standard pattern for cloud solutions that manage complex data, and which fits with the architecture to support strategy. Develop high-level Target Data, Application and Technology Architectures. Review the Architecture Vision to determine the level of detail, time, and scope of the ADM cycle phases required for architecture development for the project. Identify and estimate the cost of the main work packages. Create an Architecture Roadmap and request the Architecture Board to approve the roadmap. Start the project.
• C. Start an iteration of ADM Phase A, perform a Stakeholder Analysis, identifying the key stakeholders and revising the Architecture Vision. Update the Stakeholder map created for the strategic architecture, so it reflects the stakeholders who are now the most important for the projects that are to be developed. Hold a formal review with the CTO, who should decide which projects to include in the Architecture Roadmap and update the Implementation and Migration Plan to reflect the decisions.
• D. The superior architecture should be used to guide the approach. Review the identified projects, dependencies, and potential overlaps, then decide the order for starting the projects. Develop high-level architecture descriptions. For each project determine how much work is needed, identify reference architectures, and candidate building blocks. Identify the resource needs, considering cost and value. Document the different options, risks, and ways to control them to enable feasibility analysis and trade-off with the stakeholders.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The scenario states that:
A strategic architecture and roadmap already exist.
Business Architecture is complete, so the work now shifts to Information Systems and Technology Architectures (ADM Phases B-D).
The CTO requires use of the purpose-based EA Capability model (from the TOGAF Series Guide: A Practitioner's Approach to Developing Enterprise Architecture Following the TOGAF ADM).
The EA team has to plan, organize, and manage the next stage of architecture development, including re-use of existing hardware/software platform components, candidate solutions, feasibility, risks, and prioritization.
Under the purpose-based EA approach, when moving from strategy into defining the next layers of architecture, TOGAF emphasizes:
Using the superior (already-approved) architecture to guide the next ADM cycles
- This corresponds to the strategic architecture that is already completed.
Analyzing project dependencies, overlaps, and sequencing
Defining high-level architecture descriptions for the next iteration
Identifying reference architectures and candidate building blocks (especially when reusing existing platform components) Assessing feasibility, value, cost, and risk for each project Preparing for stakeholder trade-offs before formalizing the roadmap These tasks map directly to Option A.
Why Option A is correct
Option A includes exactly what the purpose-based EA approach prescribes at this stage:
"The superior architecture should be used to guide the approach."
✔ Correct - strategic architecture guides the work.
"Review the identified projects, dependencies, and potential overlaps, then decide the order..."
✔ Correct - sequencing and dependency assessment are core early tasks in Phases B-D planning.
"Develop high-level architecture descriptions."
✔ Correct - Business Architecture is done; now high-level IS/Tech Architecture descriptions are needed.
"Identify reference architectures and candidate building blocks."
✔ Correct - aligns with TOGAF building-block approach, and specifically fits the scenario where existing platform components will be reused.
"Identify resource needs, considering cost and value."
✔ Correct - mandatory for feasibility and planning.
"Document options, risks, and ways to control them to enable feasibility analysis and trade-off with stakeholders."
✔ Correct - this matches ADM guidelines for preparing options and addressing complexity before deeper development.
This is precisely how TOGAF expects the architecture team to plan, organize, and manage an ADM cycle after strategy is set.

NEW QUESTION # 22
......

Whether you want to improve your skills, expertise or career growth of OGEA-102 exam, with RealVCE's OGEA-102 training materials and OGEA-102 certification resources can help you achieve your goals. Our OGEA-102 Exams files feature hands-on tasks and real-world scenarios; in just a matter of days, you'll be more productive and embracing new technology standards.

Valid OGEA-102 Test Camp: https://www.realvce.com/OGEA-102_free-dumps.html

OGEA-102 test online is an indispensable tool to your examination, and we believe you are the next one on those winner lists, and it is also a normally accepted prove of effectiveness, Here we will give you a very intelligence and interactive OGEA-102 test torrent, The The Open Group OGEA-102 practice test can be used right after being bought by the customer and they can avail of the benefits given in the TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102) pdf questions, Though you can participate in the use of important factors, only the guarantee of high quality, to provide students with a better teaching method, thus our OGEA-102 study dumps bring more outstanding teaching effect.

Symbian was established by Ericsson, Motorola, Nokia, Psion, and OGEA-102 Matsushita in order to develop a mass market for wireless information devices, Binding `DataGrid` Controls to Custom Functions.

New OGEA-102 Latest Demo 100% Pass | Efficient Valid OGEA-102 Test Camp: TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam

OGEA-102 Test Online is an indispensable tool to your examination, and we believe you are the next one on those winner lists, and it is also a normally accepted prove of effectiveness.

Here we will give you a very intelligence and interactive OGEA-102 test torrent, The The Open Group OGEA-102 practice test can be used right after being bought by the customer and they can avail of the benefits given in the TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102) pdf questions.

Though you can participate in the use of important factors, only the guarantee of high quality, to provide students with a better teaching method, thus our OGEA-102 study dumps bring more outstanding teaching effect.

Here we will recommend the OGEA-102 test training material for all of you.

• OGEA-102 Reliable Exam Braindumps 🏁 Valid OGEA-102 Exam Labs 🔇 OGEA-102 Reliable Exam Registration 🚄 Search for ☀ OGEA-102 ️☀️ and download it for free immediately on [ www.examcollectionpass.com ] 🏘OGEA-102 Free Learning Cram
• Some Best Features of The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam Questions 🐴 Download 《 OGEA-102 》 for free by simply entering ⇛ www.pdfvce.com ⇚ website 🔽OGEA-102 Dumps Reviews
• OGEA-102 Exam Pattern 🏣 OGEA-102 High Passing Score 🩲 OGEA-102 Reliable Practice Materials 👧 Enter ➥ www.exam4labs.com 🡄 and search for 「 OGEA-102 」 to download for free 🏯OGEA-102 Reliable Practice Materials
• OGEA-102 Study Materials Review 🎃 Exam OGEA-102 Study Solutions Ⓜ OGEA-102 Reliable Practice Materials 🐧 Enter “ www.pdfvce.com ” and search for ➽ OGEA-102 🢪 to download for free 🥀OGEA-102 Study Materials Review
• Prepare with Confidence Using The Open Group's Updated OGEA-102 Dumps and Receive Free Updates for 1 Year 🤥 Search for ⇛ OGEA-102 ⇚ on ➥ www.verifieddumps.com 🡄 immediately to obtain a free download 🥕Valid OGEA-102 Exam Labs
• OGEA-102 Study Materials Review 🌮 OGEA-102 Study Tool 😒 OGEA-102 Materials 🐬 Enter 「 www.pdfvce.com 」 and search for { OGEA-102 } to download for free 💅Exam OGEA-102 Study Solutions
• OGEA-102 Reliable Practice Materials 🍡 OGEA-102 Valid Test Forum 🚗 OGEA-102 Materials 🏔 Enter “ www.validtorrent.com ” and search for “ OGEA-102 ” to download for free 🐯OGEA-102 Reliable Exam Registration
• Valid OGEA-102 Exam Labs 🐛 Exam OGEA-102 Study Solutions 😵 Exam OGEA-102 Study Solutions 🕡 Enter ➥ www.pdfvce.com 🡄 and search for ➥ OGEA-102 🡄 to download for free 🦪OGEA-102 Study Materials Review
• Some Best Features of The Open Group OGEA-102 Exam Questions 🤟 Easily obtain 【 OGEA-102 】 for free download through ⮆ www.vceengine.com ⮄ 🏣OGEA-102 Exam Details
• Free PDF 2026 The Open Group Updated OGEA-102 Latest Demo 🥈 Download ⏩ OGEA-102 ⏪ for free by simply entering ✔ www.pdfvce.com ️✔️ website 🚥OGEA-102 Study Materials Review
• OGEA-102 - Valid TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam Latest Demo 🐛 Easily obtain ▶ OGEA-102 ◀ for free download through 「 www.pdfdumps.com 」 🕥OGEA-102 Reliable Exam Registration
• www.aliyihou.cn, wayinner.com, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, myportal.utt.edu.tt, stackblitz.com, bbs.t-firefly.com, kemono.im, onlyfans.com, bbs.t-firefly.com, bbs.t-firefly.com, devfolio.co, Disposable vapes

What's more, part of that RealVCE OGEA-102 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1unV7YQf1CeMN48jObYKok-VPs7_XADdp